Abstract
In their response to the comments by Thomas [1999], Davisson et al. [1999a] dismiss a large set of potentiometric measurements pertinent to an understanding of the hydrogeology of Yucca and Frenchman Flats in southcentral Nevada. This commentary is submitted to demonstrate, first, that their dismissal of this data set is unfounded and, second, that these potentiometric data call into question the central thesis of the original paper by Davisson et al. [1999b].
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
