Abstract

Litterfall is a major pathway for transferring aboveground biomass to the forest floor and thus plays an important role in building forest soil carbon stocks. However, inter- and intra-annual variability of litterfall remains poorly documented, especially in North American temperate and boreal forests, due to the lack of recent long-term studies at high sampling frequencies. This potentially creates uncertainties in estimates of forest carbon budget models. The objectives of the present study were to 1) quantify the mean annual flux, interannual variability, and seasonality of litterfall in three sites (dominated respectively by sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.), balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill. 1768), and black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.)) in eastern Canada over a period of 22–32 years, 2) relate the litterfall amounts and temporal variations to the changes in the size of major organic matter pools in these ecosystems, and 3) compare our litterfall estimates with reference values used in national greenhouse gas inventories. Litterfall production decreased from the sugar maple to the balsam fir and black spruce sites, preponderantly due to species composition. Litterfall evolution was related to the aboveground biomass of live trees in both conifer sites; in contrast, in the broadleaf site, changes in forest composition and structure were apparently the main drivers. The litterfall seasonality varied between broadleaf and conifer sites and could be explained by a sigmoidal model. Substantial departures from the seasonality for some given years were likely due to important climatic anomalies. Forest floor biomass remained stable over time at all three sites despite the increase in litterfall at the balsam fir and sugar maple sites and rapid forest floor turnover at the latter site. Our analyses of litterfall suggest that reference values from the literature used for national greenhouse gas inventories underestimate annual litterfall and forest floor carbon stocks for temperate and boreal forests.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.