Abstract
We analyze a model of interactive unawareness introduced by Heifetz, Meier and Schipper. We consider two axiomatizations for their model, which capture different notions of validity. These axiomatizations allow us to compare the Heifetz et al. approach to both the standard (S5) epistemic logic and two other approaches to unawareness: that of Fagin and Halpern and that of Modica and Rustichini. We show that the differences between the Heifetz et al. approach and the others are mainly due to the notion of validity used and the fact that the Heifetz et al. approach is based on a 3-valued propositional logic.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
