Abstract

Audience response systems ('clickers') are frequently used to promote participation in large lecture classes, and evidence suggests that they convey a number of benefits to students, including improved academic performance and student satisfaction. The limitations of these systems (such as limited access and cost) can be overcome using students' personal electronic devices, such as mobile phones, tablets and laptops together with text message, web- or app-based polling systems. Using questionnaires, we compare student perceptions of clicker and smartphone based polling systems. We find that students prefer interactive lectures generally, but those that used their own device preferred those lectures over lectures using clickers. However, device users were more likely to report using their devices for other purposes (checking email, social media etc.) when they were available to answer polling questions. These students did not feel that this distracted them from the lecture, instead, concerns over the use of smartphones centred around increased battery usage and inclusivity for students without access to suitable technology. Our results suggest that students generally preferred to use their own devices over clickers, and that this may be a sensible way to overcome some of the limitations associated with clickers, although issues surrounding levels of distraction and the implications for retention and recall of information need further investigation.

Highlights

  • Audience response devices, known as electronic voting systems or ‘clickers’ have a strong body of evidence supporting their use in Higher Education (Caldwell, 2007; Kay & LeSage, 2009; reviewed in Keough, 2012)

  • Many students carry with them personal devices such as mobile phones, tablets and laptops that allow for similar interactive lectures styles using these technologies (Brett, 2011; Dahlstrom & Bichsel, 2014)

  • Interactive lectures are widely perceived as resulting in better student outcomes (Freeman et al, 2014) and the use of students’ own technology represents and effective way of overcoming some of the shortfalls associated with clickers, such as limited availability and the time associated with handing out and collecting them in (Dunn et al, 2013; King & Robinson, 2009)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Known as electronic voting systems or ‘clickers’ have a strong body of evidence supporting their use in Higher Education (Caldwell, 2007; Kay & LeSage, 2009; reviewed in Keough, 2012). The drawbacks of a text-based system, centre around the cost to the student (Voelkel & Bennett, 2014): each message carries a financial obligation on the part of the student ( some students will have bundles offering unlimited texts, many will have a limited number and some will pay per message). This additional cost to the students may be considered unacceptable, where students pay fees for their education

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.