Interactive justice, the boundary problem, and proportionality

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn Interactive Justice, Emanuela Ceva argues that the parties to an intractable value conflict should each be given an equal substantive right to a hearing. I suggest that Ceva’s account gives insufficient attention to the question of who counts as a party to a value conflict. Once more attention to this question is given, her defence of an equal right to a hearing may be put into question.