Abstract
This article describes the interactive evaluation procedures used for improving special education leadership training in the Interactive Leadership Program (ILP) at the University of Vermont (UVM). The term “interactive evaluation” was used in the ILP to convey a spirit of mutual respect in the exchange of evaluative information. The faculty continually modeled the use of evaluation feedback to inform their decisions about program improvements. The participants, settings, preprogram planning, recruitment and selection, as well as the training and evaluation procedures are described because of the uniqueness of this program. Examples of both narrative and numerical evaluation data are illustrated in the results section. Finally, the implications of the interactive evaluations for special education leadership training and for facilitating overall improvements in similar teaching/learning situations are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
