Abstract

In the Pacific Northwest, the use of forest vegetation management (FVM) and seedling stock type selection are important tools to ensure seedling establishment according to organizational objectives and state laws. Individually, these two reforestation decisions have been shown to increase growth and survival of Douglas-fir seedlings, however, the interaction between seedling stock type and level of vegetation control represents economic and ecologic tradeoffs that are less well understood. This study was designed to test the combined effects of three FVM regimes and three containerized stock types, one of which was experimental at the time, on Douglas-fir growth during the initial ten years of establishment on a site near Belfair, Washington (USA). When compared to the no-action control, FVM treatments reduced competitive plant cover below 20% during the year of application, and differences in vegetation cover persisted through the fifth growing season. Vegetation species diversity recovered quickly after FVM and there were no differences among the treatments by the third growing season. After ten growing seasons, trees in plots treated with FVM were 1.1 m taller with a mean diameter at breast height (DBH) 2.2 cm larger than those in the no-action control. Larger seedlings at the time of planting (styro-60) were 0.6 m taller with a mean DBH 1.1 cm larger than smaller seedlings (styro-8 and styro-15). The only significant stock type by FVM interaction in the experiment occurred with the survival of styro-60 seedlings growing in the no action control which had lower survival than all other treatment combinations (67% vs 91%). The long-term competitive impact of shrub cover was demonstrated by a strong non-linear relationship. Increasing cumulative shrub cover from 10% to 30% during the first two years of establishment reduced stand volume at year 10 by 79%.

Highlights

  • Understanding the synergies of silvicultural practices is important, as decisions made during the early years of stand establishment can have long-term consequences on stand development

  • The herbicide treatments applied in this study reduced vegetation cover during the year of application and continued to affect the composition and cover of vegetation through the fifth growing season (Figures 1 and 2)

  • The herbicide treatments applied in the first year (FTO and FTT) significantly reduced vegetation cover and species per plot during the first growing season when compared to the no-action control (54% vs 16%; p < 0.001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the synergies of silvicultural practices is important, as decisions made during the early years of stand establishment can have long-term consequences on stand development. The use of intensive silviculture has been shown to increase the productivity of plantation forests across the world [1,2,3,4]. Intensive silvicultural systems commonly include several practices including the use of genetically improved artificial regeneration, mechanical soil preparation, forest vegetation management, fertilizer application, and density management [5,6]. Research has shown the benefits of each of these practices on increasing forest growth, the interactive effects of these practices is less well known. In the Unites States Pacific Northwest (PNW), chemical forest vegetation management treatments (FVM) and seedling stock type selection are important tools used by forest managers to establish. Competition between the plant community and newly planted conifer seedlings is often intense, especially during the dry summer months typical of the region [7,8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call