Interactions of S-(2-haloethyl)-mercapturic acid analogs with plasmid DNA

Abstract

A series of related S-(2-haloethyl)- l-cysteine analogs were synthesized and their interaction with DNA was studied with plasmid pBR322. Both S-(2-chloroethyl)- l-cysteine (CEC) and S-(2-bromoethyl)- l-cysteine (BrEC) rapidly induced relaxation of the supercoiled plasmid as determined by agarose gel electrophoresis and electron microscopy, whereas S-(2-fluoroethyl)- l-cysteine did not interact with DNA. The relaxation was most probably due to strand scission at alkylated labile sites in the DNA. When 35S-labeled CEC or BrEC was used as the substrate, covalent binding of 35S to DNA was obtained; CEC displayed a somewhat higher binding than BrEC. No binding of 35S was obtained with (2-hydroxyethyl)- l-[ 35S]cysteine, [ 35S]cysteine, or [ 35S]cystine, substrates which did not induce relaxation of the DNA. Esterification of the carboxyl group resulted in a somewhat lower rate of DNA strand scission, whereas N-acetylation prevented the cysteine analogs from inducing DNA strand breaks. S-(2-Chloroethyl)-glutathione (GSH) did not interact with DNA as determined by lack of effect on the superhelicity of DNA, a finding which is in agreement with the hypothesis that the primary amine groups of CEC or BrEC may participate in the formation of reactive intermediates which can interact with DNA. S-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-GSH and S-(2-hydroxyethyl)- l-cysteine were unable to induce DNA strand breaks. Neutral denaturation of supercoiled pBR322 treated with the analogs revealed that compounds which were able to induce DNA strand breaks also interfered with denaturation of double-stranded circular DNA. No such interference was observed when double-stranded linear DNA (obtained by BamH1 restriction digestion) was treated with the analogs prior to denaturation. These data indicate that a marked difference exists between S-(2-chloroethyl)- l-cysteine and S-(2-chloroethyl)-glutathione in their reaction with supercoiled plasmid DNA. Either a major difference exists in the reactivity of the corresponding episulfonium ions of these conjugates or a separate mechanism of alkylation based on a free α-amino of the cysteine conjugate is participating in DNA strand breakage and possible crosslinking. In vivo toxic effects of these S-(2-chloroethyl) conjugates are predicted to be distinctly different.