Interactions of protein translocation machinery components of Streptococcus mutans

Abstract

BackgroundPivotal virulence properties of the cariogenic bacterium Streptococcus mutans depend on secreted and integral membrane proteins. Bacterial protein trafficking involves the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway components Ffh, scRNA and FtsY, the SecYEG translocon, the SecA motor protein, and membrane‐localized YidC chaperone/insertases. Unlike Escherichia coli, S. mutans survives loss of the SRP pathway. In addition, S. mutans has two yidC paralogs. The phenotype of a DyidC2 mutant largely parallels that of Dffh, while that of DyidC1 is far less severe. Also in S. mutans, YlxM acts as an accessory factor of the SRP that modulates GTP hydrolysis activities of Ffh and FtsY. The goal of this study is to identify interactions among S. mutans transport machinery components to better understand the respective functions of YidC1 and YidC2 alone and in concert with the SRP, ribosome, and/or Sec translocon that can affect the destiny of translocated proteins.MethodsA chemical cross‐linking approach was employed, whereby whole cell lysates (wcl) were treated with formaldehyde followed by Western blotting using anti‐Ffh, FtsY, YidC1 and YidC2 antibodies and mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of corresponding gel‐shifted bands. Wcl from WT and DyidC2 strains were also reacted with a‐YidC2 antibodies coupled to magnetic Dynabeads™ and co‐captured proteins identified by MS. In addition, biolayer interferometry (BLI) was used to evaluate specific interactions of the C‐terminal tails of YidC1 and YidC2, engineered as glutathione‐S‐transferase fusion proteins (GST‐C1 and GST‐C2), with the SRP components Ffh and YlxM. The same GST‐constructs were also subjected to 2D Difference Gel Electrophoresis (DIGE), in which each was reacted with wcl, captured with glutathione affinity resin, and labelled individually with fluorescent dyes. Spots unique to the GST‐C1 and/or GST‐C2 samples were analysed by MS.Results and ConclusionBand‐shift patterns detected with anti‐Ffh, FtsY and YidC2 antisera were similar to one another and distinct from that of anti‐YidC1. Cross‐linked proteins included elongation factor Tu, DNA‐directed RNA polymerase subunit b, and HSP 70. Immunocaptured proteins from anti‐YidC2 Dynabeads™ included two small, transmembrane proteins, LemA and SMU_1719c, which may represent translocation substrates. Both GST‐C1 and GST‐C2 interacted with Ffh by BLI with binding influenced by YlxM. Over one hundred spots were identified by DIGE. Among differentially identified proteins in the GST‐C1 sample were DnaK, RNA polymerase subunit d, and cell division protein FtsH. Ribosomal proteins S7 and L13 were prevalent in spots of the GST‐C2 sample, whereas ribosomal protein L2, DNA polymerase III g/t subunit, and the Cas5 homolog were all more abundant in spots from GST‐C1 and GST‐C2 samples compared to GST. This information suggests a coupled cellular machinery that integrates transcription and translation with protein transport and folding.Support or Funding InformationNIH R01DE008007This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.