Abstract

The interactions of four pathotypes of Diplocarpon rosae with 34 species and hybrids of Rosa were compared in an ongoing search for criteria of potential relevance to rose breeding. There were greater similarities in the resistance‐susceptibility interactions of these roses to the pathotypes DA1, CW1 and ZM1, than to a fourth pathotype, DA2. Among the species roses, only those of the section Cinnamomeae were susceptible to DA2 and this susceptibility was transmitted in several cases to hybrid progeny. CW1 had the greatest pathogenicity of the four pathotypes. In a cross between R. rugosa cv. Scabrosa, which was resistant and R. rugosa f. alba, which was susceptible to all pathotypes, the progeny were tested for resistance to pathotypes DA1, CW1 and ZM1. Each of the 20 progeny was susceptible to all three pathotypes. This shows that, unlike the well characterized Rdr1 gene for resistance to D. rosae, the resistance of R. rugosa cv. Scabrosa is not determined by a dominant major gene. The diploid hybrid, R. rugosa cv. Martin Frobisher × cv. Mistress Quickly, was resistant to all four pathotypes, but an induced tetraploid of this hybrid was susceptible to all pathotypes. The relevance of these findings to the breeding of roses for resistance to black spot disease is discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call