Abstract

AbstractEfforts are underway to re‐evaluate the use of existing instream infrastructure (e.g., weirs, water control dams) for the purposes of hydroelectric generation, with new very low head turbine technology that is purportedly “fish friendly” making retrofitting a viable option. This is the case at Wasdell Falls on the Severn River, ON, Canada, where the first very low head (VLH) turbines in Canada were put into operation at a long‐standing low‐head dam site. There is little information regarding fish usage of areas upstream from these structures and how this may relate to entrainment risk. Therefore, we assessed the risk of entrainment based on fish use of the forebay areas upstream from the infrastructure, including the forebay of three operating VLH turbines. Acoustic telemetry was used to determine movements and entrainment events of eight north temperate fish species. Entrainment through the VLH turbines did not occur over the course of one year, however, several fish did move downstream via other paths (e.g., over the water control structure). Forebay use was exclusive to rock bass, smallmouth bass, northern pike and largemouth bass, whereas channel catfish, walleye, white sucker and pumpkinseed avoided the forebay. When near the dam, fish tended to select deeper areas located away from the VLH forebay. Fish use of the VLH forebay was limited to brief forays indicating exploratory movements rather than prolonged residence. The findings suggest that entrainment risk at this VLH turbine site is low for the species and life stages studied.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call