Abstract

Several types of suppression phenomena have been observed in the visual system. For example, the ability to detect a target stimulus is often impaired when the target is embedded in a high-contrast surround. This contextual modulation, known as surround suppression, was formerly thought to occur only in the periphery. Another type of suppression phenomena is interocular suppression, in which the sensitivity to a monocular target is reduced by a superimposed mask in the opposite eye. Here, we explored how the two types of suppression operating across different spatial regions interact with one another when they simultaneously exert suppressive influences on a common target presented at the fovea. In our experiments, a circular target grating presented to the fovea of one eye was suppressed interocularly by a noise pattern of the same size in the other eye. The foveal stimuli were either shown alone or surrounded by a monocular annular grating. The orientation and eye-of-origin of the surround grating were varied. We found that the detection of the foveal target subjected to interocular suppression was severely impaired by the addition of the surround grating, indicating strong surround suppression in the fovea. In contrast, when the interocular suppression was released by superimposing a binocular fusion ring onto both the target and the dichoptic mask, the surround suppression effect was found to be dramatically decreased. In addition, the surround suppression was found to depend on the contrast of the dichoptic noise with the greatest surround suppression effect being obtained only when the noise contrast was at an intermediate level. These findings indicate that surround suppression and interocular suppression are not independent of each other, but there are strong interactions between them. Moreover, our results suggest that strong surround suppression may also occur at the fovea and not just the periphery.

Highlights

  • The detectability and appearance of a target are often suppressed in the presence of a superimposed or surrounding mask

  • These suppressive phenomena have been observed in electrophysiological studies, which have demonstrated that the response of a neuron to an optimal stimulus in the classical receptive field (CRF) can be reduced by an overlapping or a flanking stimulus that alone evokes little or no response [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]

  • The center target grating, which was concurrently masked by a dichoptic stimulus, was either presented alone or surrounded by a monoptic parallel grating (MP), a monoptic orthogonal grating (MO), a dichoptic parallel grating (DP), or a dichoptic orthogonal grating (DO)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The detectability and appearance of a target are often suppressed in the presence of a superimposed or surrounding mask. The third suppressive phenomenon is referred to as interocular suppression ( called dichoptic masking), in which the target and the mask are spatially superimposed but presented dichoptically to the two eyes [11,13,14]. These suppressive phenomena have been observed in electrophysiological studies, which have demonstrated that the response of a neuron to an optimal stimulus in the classical receptive field (CRF) can be reduced by an overlapping or a flanking stimulus that alone evokes little or no response [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.