Abstract

AbstractSpecies responses to climate change have been shown to vary in both direction and magnitude. Understanding these idiosyncratic responses is crucial if we are to predict extinction risk and set up efficient conservation strategies. The variations observed across species have been related to several species attributes including intrinsic traits such as physiological tolerances or life‐history strategies but also to niche characteristics (e.g., niche breadth [NB], niche position [NP]). However, although previous studies have successfully linked species attributes to population dynamics or range shifts, few have considered synergistic effects to explain responses to climate variations. Here, we assessed whether five species attributes (fecundity, thermal safety margin, trophic position [TP], NB, and NP) explained interspecific differences in four parameters influencing population dynamics of 35 stream fish species at the French scale. We used Bayesian N‐mixture models to estimate posterior distributions of the growth rate, the strength of density dependence, and the influence of both mean temperature and temperature variability on populations for each species. We then used phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) models to investigate the influence of species attributes and their interactions on interspecific differences in each of the four parameter driving population dynamics. The percentage of variance explained by the PGLS models was relatively high (around 40% on average), indicating that species attributes are good predictors of species population dynamics. Furthermore, we showed that the influence of these single attributes was mediated by other attributes, especially NP and TP. Importantly, we found that models including interaction terms had greater support over simple additive models in explaining interspecific differences in population dynamics. Taken together, these results point to the importance of considering the interplay between species attributes in unraveling the mechanisms involved in population dynamics and understanding the vulnerability of species to global change.

Highlights

  • Over the past decades, many studies have investigated the potential risks to biodiversity posed by climate change (Buckley and Kingsolver 2011)

  • Over the 3000 runs, 6922 models were selected to explain interspecific differences in the growth rate and 8050 models to explain a variation in the strength of density dependence

  • FE was positively related to the strength of density dependence, whereas a negative relationship was found with niche position (NP) (Fig. 3b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many studies have investigated the potential risks to biodiversity posed by climate change (Buckley and Kingsolver 2011). While many studies have investigated range shifts in response to recent climate change (Walther et al 2002), mounting empirical. Evidence suggests that subtle changes within the distributional ranges of species (i.e., on populations) are likely (Sæther et al 2008). Despite the large variability in species responses across taxonomic groups, these studies revealed that specialists, warm-intolerant species, and poor-disperser species have responded most strongly to climate warming (Buckley and Kingsolver 2011). Despite the implications of population trends for local extirpation and extinction processes, we still know little about the impact of climate on population dynamics across different species (Bowler et al 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call