Abstract

In the field of organizational behaviour, interactional justice and perceived supervisor support have a critical role in directing employees’ behaviour in either positive or negative direction. Keeping this in mind, this paper looks at the effect of interactional injustice on employees’ deviant behaviour with perceived supervisor support as a mediator. To link the study variables, equity and social exchange theories were used. The extensive literature on destructive deviance has been reviewed. To empirically test the relationship, a two-phase sampling technique (first clustering and then purposive) was applied through which 160 responses from the Hotel and Tourism industry of KP province were collected. A single structured adapted questionnaire was employed. The findings of the study reveal the presence of a negative relationship between interactional justice and deviant workplace behaviour. Further, the results demonstrated that perceived supervisor support mediates this relationship. All the results of the study are statistically significant. The study has theoretical as well as practical implications. Theoretically, the results of the study would help the organizational behaviour scholars to understand the issue in a different organizational environment. Practically, the findings will assist managers to understand the critical role of the supervisor which is instrumental in enhancing the morale of employees at the workplace. This will help them understand how supervisor support can affect the frequency and intensity of deviant workplace behaviour. The study has some limitations like sampling, subjective opinion of the participants, and limited numbers of the variables. In future, this research can be replicated in other sectors like education, health, banking, and other industries.

Highlights

  • When it is said ‘employees are asset of an organization’, it is neither their number nor their qualification

  • The interactional justice was found highly correlated with perceived supervisor support with the value of (r = 0.45**)

  • The results indicated that the three factor model χ2= 183.0, p < 0.00, RMSEA = 0.05, CFI = 0.96, IFI = 0.96, revealed a better fit to the data than the other models including the twofactor model χ2 (107) = 107.0, p\.000, RMSEA = 0.09, CFI = 0.87, IFI = 0.87), and the one factor model χ2 =750.0, p 0.000; RMSEA = 0.21, CFI = 0.11, IFI = 0.12, the results of three-factor model (i.e., Interactional justice, perceived supervisor support and deviant workplace behavior) best fit the data χ2 =182.981,p < 0.00, CFI = 0.96, IFI= 0.96, RMSEA = 0.05) than the other two models which consist of fewer factors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When it is said ‘employees are asset of an organization’, it is neither their number nor their qualification. Organizations must look into the factors that affect the behaviour of their employees as it has direct correlation to organizations’ success (Ali et al 2021; Shrestha & Subedi, 2020). This understanding of human behaviour will enable them to build and maintain a competent and cooperative workforce. Notwithstanding, employees have been found with dissimilar behaviour—constructive and destructive (deviant) behavioral inclination The former is beneficial and desired for both the employee and the organization while the latter is detrimental and undesirable for both (Vadera, Pratt, & Mishra, 2013). A question arises: why employees get engaged in the latter when it is detrimental and undesirable?

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call