Abstract
The form errors of cylindrical workpiece turned between centres caused due to machine tool compliance (reciprocal of rigidity or stiffness) and workpiece compliance compensate each other to some extent. The paper analyses the extent of mutual compensation of these form errors. It shows that the most rigid machine tool need not be the best one from the point of view of accuracy of turned workpieces and that there is an optimum combination of machine tool and workpiece rigidities. It establishes a quantitative criterion for an optimum use of stays in turning practice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
