Abstract

Several groups of growth-retarding chemicals have been reported in recent years. They belong to quite distinct chemical classes, but their effect on plant growth is similar. These include nicotinium compounds (31), quaternary ammonium carbamates (16), phosphonium compounds (37), choline analogues (42), and succinnamic acid derivatives (39). Unlike other types of growth inhibitors (e.g. maleic hydrazide) these compounds retard stem elongation without causing malformation of the plant. Their effects on plants are in many aspects opposite to those of gibberellin (3,42). Most of these inverse effects of the growth retardants and gibberellins are mutually antagonized when both chemicals are applied to the same plant (2, 3, 5, 7, 13, 14, 22, 27, 28, 41). It was therefore suggested (27, 42) that they be designated antigibberellins. This terminology has caused controversy. While Lockhart (27) concluded that a functional interaction exists between gibberellin and the growth retardants, Kuraishi and Muir (25) came to the conclusion, that these compounds do not interact directly with gibberellin, but rather with auxin. Stuart and Cathey (40) also felt that the growth-retarding chemicals should not be called antigibberellins. Our study presents data which are pertinent to this discussion.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.