Abstract

We study how the structure of the interaction network affects self-organized collective motion in two minimal models of self-propelled agents: the Vicsek model and the Active-Elastic (AE) model. We perform simulations with topologies that interpolate between a nearest-neighbour network and random networks with different degree distributions to analyse the relationship between the interaction topology and the resilience to noise of the ordered state. For the Vicsek case, we find that a higher fraction of random connections with homogeneous or power-law degree distribution increases the critical noise, and thus the resilience to noise, as expected due to small-world effects. Surprisingly, for the AE model, a higher fraction of random links with power-law degree distribution can decrease this resilience, despite most links being long-range. We explain this effect through a simple mechanical analogy, arguing that the larger presence of agents with few connections contributes localized low-energy modes that are easily excited by noise, thus hindering the collective dynamics. These results demonstrate the strong effects of the interaction topology on self-organization. Our work suggests potential roles of the interaction network structure in biological collective behaviour and could also help improve decentralized swarm robotics control and other distributed consensus systems.

Highlights

  • In the study of complex systems, the dynamics of multiple interacting components is typically analysed using one of two different modelling approaches: agent-based or network-based

  • We explore the relationship between the interaction topology and self-organization of two different types of models of collective motion: one velocity-based, represented by the Vicsek model, and one position-based, represented by the AE model

  • We show that the interaction topology affects both models strongly but in very different ways and that, surprisingly, in some cases long-range SF connections can hinder the collective dynamics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the study of complex systems, the dynamics of multiple interacting components is typically analysed using one of two different modelling approaches: agent-based or network-based. Most collective motion algorithms are based on underlying distributed consensus dynamics, a different mechanism for achieving self-organization was unveiled in the recently introduced Active-Elastic (AE) model, where agents interact by exchanging only their relative positions [11,12]. We explore the relationship between the interaction topology and self-organization of two different types of models of collective motion: one velocity-based, represented by the Vicsek model, and one position-based, represented by the AE model We study their resilience to noise for different fixed interaction networks that are not constrained only to nearest neighbours, but can contain interactions with randomly chosen agents, which are typically long-range since these can be located anywhere in the system.

Collective motion models
The Vicsek-Network model
The Active-Elastic model
Interaction networks
Nearest-neighbour networks
Erdös–Rényi networks
Scale-free networks
Network superposition method
Simulations and results
Bifurcation diagrams
Vicsek-Network model bifurcation diagrams
Active-Elastic model bifurcation diagrams
Critical noise as a function of topological structure
Critical noise as a function of scale-free exponent
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.