Abstract
Abstract The law of restitution has developed rapidly in recent decades. Many concepts have been created, refined, and diminished. The proprietary base theory is one of the concepts that is increasingly marginalized. This article examines this theory and advocates its rejuvenation. By analysing the decision Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus UK Ltd, the interaction between the proprietary base theory and the principle of equitable subrogation is dissected. This article concludes that the proprietary base theory can clarify uncertainties in subrogation cases involving proprietary claims and remains an important tool in relevant litigations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
