Abstract

Numerous macrophage-restricted promoters lack TATA boxes or other conventional initiation motifs but contain high affinity binding sites (PU boxes) for the macrophage-restricted Ets family transcription factor PU.1. In RAW264 murine macrophages, multimerized PU boxes were not active as enhancers when placed upstream of a minimal promoter. To model their role in basal promoters, we inserted PU boxes into a promoterless luciferase reporter plasmid. Two sites, regardless of orientation, were necessary and sufficient to direct reporter gene expression in transient transfections of the RAW264 macrophage-like cell line. This activity was absent in transfected 3T3 fibroblasts but could be induced by PU.1 coexpression. Both the model promoter and the macrophage-specific mouse and human c-fms promoters were activated in RAW264 cells by other Ets family transcription factors, Ets-2 and Elf-1. In fibroblasts, the effects of PU.1 and Ets-2 were multiplicative, whereas overexpression of PU.1 in RAW264 cells reduced activation of c-fms or model promoters by the other Ets factors. The PU.1 and Ets-2 binding sites of the mouse c-fms promoter have been located by DNase footprinting. A conserved Ets-like motif at the transcription site, CAGGAAC, that bound only weakly to PU.1, was identified as an additional critical basal c-fms promoter element. Comparison of studies on the model promoter, c-fms and other myeloid promoters provides evidence for a conserved mechanism that involves three separate and functionally distinct Ets-like motifs.

Highlights

  • Numerous macrophage-restricted promoters lack TATA boxes or other conventional initiation motifs but contain high affinity binding sites (PU boxes) for the macrophage-restricted Ets family transcription factor PU.1

  • RAW264 cells or HeLa cells were transfected by electroporation as described under “Materials and Methods” with 10 ␮g of pBL-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) plasmids plus 1 ␮g of the indicated transcription factor expression plasmids

  • This study shows that PU.1 recognition sites are weak enhancer elements in RAW264 macrophages (Table I), but alone they are sufficient to activate a minimal promoter in the absence of a TATA box or consensus initiator element (Fig. 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Numerous macrophage-restricted promoters lack TATA boxes or other conventional initiation motifs but contain high affinity binding sites (PU boxes) for the macrophage-restricted Ets family transcription factor PU.. Regardless of orientation, were necessary and sufficient to direct reporter gene expression in transient transfections of the RAW264 macrophage-like cell line This activity was absent in transfected 3T3 fibroblasts but could be induced by PU. coexpression. Both the model promoter and the macrophage-specific mouse and human c-fms promoters were activated in RAW264 cells by other Ets family transcription factors, Ets-2 and Elf-1. Zhang et al [10] provided evidence that the more distal site has higher PU. binding affinity, but deletion of either site lowers the basal promoter activity substantially [23], indicating that both are required One of these PU. sites is clearly present in the mouse promoter (Fig. 1), but at Ϫ170M there is a candidate PU. site on the opposite strand. In the course of this study, we provide evidence for a separate role in initiation for GGAA motifs to which PU. binds weakly, if at all

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call