Abstract

The mass of an accelerated body moving at relativistic velocity was discovered by A. Einstein and H.A. Lorentz to depend on whether the acceleration is carried out in the direction of motion or in a transverse direction. E. P. Epstein rejected this result in the “Annalen der Physik”; he rather postulated an additional force that turns up when the body is accelerated in the longitudinal direction. It is possible to demonstrate that the idea of an increased longitudinal mass is based on a simple mathematical mistake. It turns out that Epstein's hidden extra force is necessary to remedy this problem in order to prevent Special Relativity from being internally inconsistent. Given that the speed reached is relativistic, it performs the majority of the total work absorbed by the moving object and is therefore in charge of the majority of the increase in its energy (=mass). In other words: While the total force on the body needed to maintain a constant acceleration a0 is “(1-v²/c²)-1 ma0=m0(1-v²/c²)-3/2 a0”, the technical force needed to maintain that acceleration amounts only to “ma0=m0(1-v²/c²)-½a0”. Therefore, the total energy of two objects that collide symmetrically and elastically is not preserved during the collision, necessitating the presence of a hidden energy source. This result is confirmed by calculations that use the concept of momenergy. In particle physics, the phenomena of a seeming loss of energy has already been noted (target experiment), but its effects have gone unnoticed. Instead, a reason (reduced "energy of the centre of mass") has been offered that is inconsistent and goes against the relativity principle.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.