Abstract
In today's marine habitats, anthropogenic noise is widespread in space and time, affecting aquatic animal communities. Short-term exposure to noise is known to affect vital behaviours, such as the ability to evade predators. However, long-term noise pollution may lead to differences in short-term responses between naïve and experienced animals. We investigated the interaction between short-term and long-term sound exposure on the antipredator response of free-ranging sand gobies, Pomatoschistus minutus. We tested the effects of short-term boat noise playback on the response to a simulated predator strike in areas across a range of low to high long-term noise disturbance levels. Exposure to boat noise did not affect the startle response, time frozen or response latency of gobies to a predator stimulus. However, individuals exposed to short-term boat noise playback were absent from the experimental area for shorter periods after the predator strike than gobies exposed to the silent control. Moreover, gobies in long-term noisy habitats also stopped avoiding the area after the predator strike under silent control conditions. These changes point to a decreased magnitude in antipredator response, as a function of interacting short- and longer-term levels of disturbance. Thus, prey species alter their antipredator behaviour in ways that can potentially lead to higher mortality for individual prey. This could ultimately have implications at the level of the food web.
Highlights
In today's marine habitats, anthropogenic noise is widespread in space and time, affecting aquatic animal communities
We investigated the interaction between short-term and longterm sound exposure on the antipredator response of free-ranging sand gobies, Pomatoschistus minutus
Individuals exposed to short-term boat noise playback were absent from the experimental area for shorter periods after the predator strike than gobies exposed to the silent control
Summary
In today's marine habitats, anthropogenic noise is widespread in space and time, affecting aquatic animal communities. Both distraction and vigilance have been reported in experimental studies of predation risk under noise exposure, for some studies the experimental set-up leaves room for other interpretations (distraction: Chan et al, 2010; McCormick et al, 2018; Morris-Drake et al, 2016; Simpson et al, 2015, 2016; vigilance: Karp & Root, 2009; Kern & Radford, 2016; Shannon et al, 2016; Voellmy et al, 2014) Still, these reported changes were all for animals living in quiet conditions, while the type and magnitude of the effect is likely to be different for individuals in disturbed versus nondisturbed areas (Bejder et al, 2006). To the best of our knowledge, combined effects of short- and long-term sound exposure on antipredator behaviour have never been tested
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.