Abstract

BackgroundQualitative and quantitative assessment of renal blood flow is valuable in the evaluation of patients with renal and renovascular diseases as well as in patients with heart failure. The temporal pattern of renal flow velocity through the cardiac cycle provides important information about renal haemodynamics. High temporal resolution interleaved spiral phase velocity mapping could potentially be used to study temporal patterns of flow and measure resistive and pulsatility indices which are measures of downstream resistance.MethodsA retrospectively gated breath-hold spiral phase velocity mapping sequence (TR 19 ms) was developed at 3 Tesla. Phase velocity maps were acquired in the proximal right and left arteries of 10 healthy subjects in each of two separate scanning sessions. Each acquisition was analysed by two independent observers who calculated the resistive index (RI), the pulsatility index (PI), the mean flow velocity and the renal artery blood flow (RABF). Inter-study and inter-observer reproducibility of each variable was determined as the mean +/− standard deviation of the differences between paired values. The effect of background phase errors on each parameter was investigated.ResultsRI, PI, mean velocity and RABF per kidney were 0.71+/− 0.06, 1.47 +/− 0.29, 253.5 +/− 65.2 mm/s and 413 +/− 122 ml/min respectively. The inter-study reproducibilities were: RI −0.00 +/− 0.04 , PI −0.03 +/− 0.17, mean velocity −6.7 +/− 31.1 mm/s and RABF per kidney 17.9 +/− 44.8 ml/min. The effect of background phase errors was negligible (<2% for each parameter).ConclusionsHigh temporal resolution breath-hold spiral phase velocity mapping allows reproducible assessment of renal pulsatility indices and RABF.

Highlights

  • Qualitative and quantitative assessment of renal blood flow is valuable in the evaluation of patients with renal and renovascular diseases as well as in patients with heart failure

  • Invasive Doppler flow-wire studies in pigs have shown that renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) induces favourable increases in renal artery peak velocity and renal artery blood flow (RABF) coupled with an advantageous decrease in resistive index (RI) [4]

  • Subsequent paired t-testing showed very small but statistically significant differences between the stationary phantom corrected measurements and those derived without background correction, the mean difference being 0.0%, 1.3%, 1.1% and 1.0% for RI, pulsatility index (PI), mean velocity and RABF respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of renal blood flow is valuable in the evaluation of patients with renal and renovascular diseases as well as in patients with heart failure. There has been much interest in the role of renal sympathetic denervation (RSD), a novel percutaneous transcatheter technique for the treatment of patients with hypertension and heart failure [3]. This procedure aims to interrupt the efferent and afferent sympathetic nerves at the renal level and is believed to exert its beneficial effects by improving renal perfusion and renal artery compliance amongst others. Background velocity (mm/s) RABF per kidney (ml/min) Mean velocity (mm/s) Resistive index Pulsatility index correction method None 0 +/− 0 413 +/− 122 253.5 +/− 65.2

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.