Abstract
To speculate on human responses from animal studies, scale-up factors (body weight, lung volume, or lung surface area ratios) are currently used to extrapolate aerosol lung deposition from animal to human. However, those existing scale-up methods between animals and humans neglected two important inter-subject variability factors: (1) the effect of anatomical differences in respiratory systems from mouth/nose to peripheral lungs between human and rat, and (2) the effect of spatial distributions and temporal evolutions of temperature and relative humidity (RH) on droplet size change dynamics between the two species. To test the above-mentioned inter-species variability effects on droplet fates in pulmonary routes and generate correlations as a precise scale-up method for lung deposition estimation, this study simulated the transport of pure-water droplets in both human and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rat respiratory systems. Employing an experimentally validated Euler-Lagrange based Computational Fluid-Particle Dynamics (CFPD) model, simulations were performed for droplets with Stk/Fr between 8.36 × 10−5 and 1.25 × 10−2. Droplets were inhaled through human and rat nostrils under resting breathing conditions. Numerical results indicate that RH becomes uniformly distributed in rat airways sooner than in human airways, which significantly influences droplet size change dynamics and the resultant droplet trajectories in pulmonary routes. Using the Stokes-Froude dimensionless number group (i.e., Stk/Fr) as the independent variable, the regional deposition fractions (DFs) and evaporation fractions (EFs) in both rat and human respiratory systems collapsed into unified correlations. Such correlations can be used for the new rat-to-human scale-up method, estimating the lung depositions with consideration of anatomical differences. Furthermore, the necessity to employ realistic RH and temperature boundary conditions (BCs) at airway walls was also confirmed for the accurate prediction of droplet size change using CFPD model. Employing idealized BCs leads the droplets to evaporate slower and deposit more than using realistic RH and temperature BCs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Journal of Aerosol Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.