Inter-practitioner comparisons of nerve conduction studies with standardized techniques in normal subjects: Reap as you sow.

Abstract

This 2-group study was carried out to determine the inter-practitioner difference of nerve conduction studies with standardized techniques.56 normal subjects of 19 to 49 year-old were recruited, 29, and 27 in the 2 labs respectively. Tests were carried out unilaterally on: 5 motor nerve distal latency, conduction velocities (MNCV) and minimum latency of F wave, 3 sensory nerves with negative amplitude, onset, and peak distal latency, sensory nerve distal latency.T-test disclosed 4(15.4%) attributes with statistical significance (P < .05). They were 2 of 4 (50%) compound motor action potentials, which were ulnar and tibial nerve, and 2 of 6 (33.3%) MNCVs, which were elbow-to-wrist MNCV of median nerve and cross-fibula MNCV of peroneal nerve. No differences were disclosed in motor nerve distal latencys, minimum latency of F waves and all sensory attributes.Inconsistency pattern of certain attributes were found. This could be explained with the insufficient definition of related techniques.