Inter-Philosophical Analytical Role Of Doctrine Of Marxism And Doctrine Of Mohism In Shaping International, Inter-Civilisational Development And Multilevel Governance Mechanisms

Abstract

Both Doctrine of Marxism and Doctrine of Mohism had been exerting in-depth influences over nature and scope of individuality and collective being, the significance of labour and humanism, ethical and social status and collective, communal human development, which may be far more philosophically and ideationally and even institutionally indispensable in the contemporary international society of imbalanced uncoordinated, and unsustainable world system of remaining capitalistic production network and the comparative predominance of one singular superpower over the alternatives in relative terms. Both of these philosophical doctrines highlight neither narrow mindset nor self-centered preference over the interests of one dominant, privileged groups against those of the underprivileged and underdeveloped but rather, comparatively speaking, universal, communal fraternity and courage in the exchange of mutual benefit and production amongst the dispossessed groups and rejection of a kind of unfair governance mechanism and institution--provided that a set of criteria on international, inter-civilisational human development should be principally prioritised, for both of these philosophical schools fairly represent and serve the core interests of the underprivileged and the dispossessed in their corresponding, respective eras and their doctrines may have contradicted with the comparable interests of the privileged, powerful and aristocratic elite communities, who tend to launch profound vitriolic criticisms upon the exaggerated falsifiability, invalidity and non-sustainability of School of Marxism and School of Mohism.