Abstract

Currently there are no mandated exposure limits for endotoxin, but recommended limits have been proposed and interest expressed in developing quantitative standards for endotoxin. A limitation for developing a quantitative standard for endotoxin is the measurement variability between laboratories. Inter-laboratory variability of up to four orders of magnitude has been reported for replicate samples. To evaluate both the intra- and inter-laboratory variability, Round-Robin studies were conducted using replicate samples of cotton dust. Replicate samples of cotton dust were collected using vertical elutriators (VE) in a model cardroom. Each participating laboratory evaluated the samples for endotoxin using: their normal extraction procedure; a common extraction procedure; and a common extraction procedure and the same type and lot of a commercially available endotoxin kit. These studies demonstrated that both intra- and inter-laboratory variability is reduced by using a common extraction protocol and a common assay kit; however, significant differences remained between the laboratories. The data suggest that intra-laboratory assays can be used to assess the relative differences between endotoxin samples, however, the inter-laboratory variability suggests that limitations remain for developing a reliable exposure assessment assay that could be used for a quantitative exposure standard.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call