Abstract

To evaluate the inter-individual variance and the variability of the aortic root dimensions during the cardiac cycle by computed tomography (CT) in patients with severe aortic stenosis prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Fifty-six patients (m/w = 16/40, 81 ± 6.8 years), scheduled for a transapical aortic valve implantation with available preprocedural ECG-gated CT were retrospectively included. The evaluation included sizing of the aortic annulus and the aortic sinus, measurements of the coronary topography, aortic valve planimetry and scoring of calcification. The new defined aortic annulus sphericity ratio revealed a mostly elliptical shape with increasing diastolic deformation. The calculated effective diameter (ED), determined from the annulus’ lumen area, turned out to be the parameter least affected from cardiac cycle changes while systolic and diastolic annulus dimensions and shape (diameter and area) differed significantly (p < 0.001). In about 70 % of the patients with relevant paravalvular leaks the finally implanted prosthesis was too small according to the CT based calculated ED. The ostial height of the coronaries showed a high variability with a critical minimum range <5 mm. The degree of the aortic calcification did not have an influence on the aortic annulus deformation during the cardiac cycle, but on the occurrence of paravalvular leaks. The aortic root anatomy demonstrated a high inter-individual variability and cardiac cycle dependency. These results must be strongly considered during the patient evaluation prior to TAVI to avoid complications. The systolic effective diameter, as measured by ECG-gated CT, represents an appropriate parameter for sizing the aortic annulus.

Highlights

  • Catheter-based antegrade and retrograde aortic valve implantation are promising treatment methods for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and high perioperative risk

  • To describe the aortic annulus sphericity and its varying shape during the cardiac cycle, we introduced the anatomical aligned aortic annulus sphericity ratio (AASR)

  • ECG-gated computed tomography (CT) data prior to a scheduled percutaneous valve implantation were available for evaluation in 56 patients (m/f = 16/40, mean age 81.6 ± 6.8 years)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Catheter-based antegrade (transapical) and retrograde (transfemoral) aortic valve implantation are promising treatment methods for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and high perioperative risk. These transcatheter approaches have shown promising postoperative results because they have a significantly lower perioperative risk [1, 2] and are already considered to be routine procedures in experienced facilities. These approaches have the disadvantage of not allowing direct visualization of the aortic valve and the aortic root during the interventional procedure. Intra-operative imaging modalities such as fluoroscopy, TEE and 3D-rotational angiography can be used [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.