Abstract

Aims and objectives:The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of speech development across successive generations of heritage language users, examining how cross-linguistic, developmental and socio-cultural factors affect stop consonant production.Design:To this end, we recorded Sylheti and English stop productions of two sets of Bangladeshi heritage families: (1) first-generation adult migrants from Bangladesh and their (second-generation) UK-born children, and (2) second-generation UK-born adult heritage language users and their (third-generation) UK-born children.Data and analysis:The data were analysed auditorily, using whole-word transcription, and acoustically, examining voice onset time. Comparisons were then made in both languages across the four groups of participants, and cross-linguistically.Findings:The results revealed non-native productions of English stops by the first-generation migrants but largely target-like patterns by the remaining sets of participants. The Sylheti stops exhibited incremental changes across successive generations of speakers, with the third-generation children’s productions showing the greatest influence from English.Originality:This is one of few studies to examine both the host and heritage language in an ethnic minority setting, and the first to demonstrate substantial differences in heritage language accent between age-matched second- and third-generation children. The study shows that current theories of bilingual speech learning do not go far enough in explaining how speech develops in heritage language settings.Implications:These findings have important implications for the maintenance, transmission and long-term survival of heritage languages, and show that investigations need to go beyond second-generation speakers, in particular in communities that do not see a steady influx of new migrants.

Highlights

  • A growing body of research has shown that individuals raised in an ethnic minority setting develop different pronunciation patterns from the generation of their foreign-born parents (e.g., Evans, Mistry, Moreiras, 2007; McCarthy, Evans & Mahon, 2011, 2013; Nagy, 2015; Nagy & Kochetov, 2013; Sharma & Sankaran, 2011)

  • Do second- and third-generation children in language minority settings differ from each other in their pronunciation of the heritage language and the host language? If so, how do the differences manifest, and can they be explained on the basis of their parents’ production patterns? The present study aims to address these questions by investigating the stop consonant productions of two sets of Bangladeshi heritage families: (1) first-generation female migrants from the Sylhet area of Bangladesh and their UK-born children, and (2) second-generation UK-born female Sylheti heritage language users and their children

  • The results revealed significantly longer voice onset time (VOT) values for the GEN 3 CHILDREN on both Sylheti stops than the GEN 1 MUMS (/b/: p= .003; /bɦ/: p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A growing body of research has shown that individuals raised in an ethnic minority setting develop different pronunciation patterns from the generation of their foreign-born parents (e.g., Evans, Mistry, Moreiras, 2007; McCarthy, Evans & Mahon, 2011, 2013; Nagy, 2015; Nagy & Kochetov, 2013; Sharma & Sankaran, 2011). The present study aims to address these questions by investigating the stop consonant productions of two sets of Bangladeshi heritage families: (1) first-generation female migrants from the Sylhet area of Bangladesh and their UK-born children, and (2) second-generation UK-born female Sylheti heritage language users and their (third-generation) children. In so doing, it aims to disentangle the effects of cross-linguistic, developmental and sociocultural factors. This has led many to abandon maturation-based accounts, and instead to explain age effects on the basis of extra-linguistic factors, such as L1 and L2 usage patterns (Flege, Frieda & Nozawa, 1997; Flege, MacKay & Piske, 2002; Piske et al, 2001; Yeni-Komshian et al, 2000)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call