Inter-field strength agreement of cardiovascular magnetic resonance cine-derived strain and strain rate measures: a randomised study

Abstract

Abstract Background Left ventricular (LV) strain and strain rate measurements can be derived from routinely acquired cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cine images by feature tracking techniques. However, the inter-field strength agreement of strain measurements derived from these techniques is not known. We hypothesised that there would be excellent inter-field strength agreement (between 1.5 and 3 Tesla [T]) for the measurement of global strain and strain rate derived from cine imaging. Methods Prospective, randomised cross-over observational study. Healthy volunteers each underwent CMR scans at 1.5T and 3T within 30 minutes on the same day in a randomised order. Retrospectively ECG gated, short and long-axis balanced steady state free precession cine images were obtained using standardised acquisition parameters at both field strengths. Two software packages were used to derive LV global longitudinal, circumferential and long and short axis radial systolic strain, peak systolic, early diastolic and late diastolic strain rates. All strain values are expressed as positive numbers. Results Twenty-two subjects (mean age 36±12 years; 45% male) were studied. No differences in heart rate and blood pressure measurements during scanning were observed between field strengths. The abstract figure shows an example of strain analysis and Bland-Altman plots for global longitudinal and circumferential strain. Minimal bias was seen in all strain and strain rate measurements between field strengths using the first software package. Strain and strain rate values derived from long axis images (longitudinal and long axis radial) showed poor to fair agreement (intraclass correlation co-efficient (ICC) range 0.39–0.71), whereas measures derived from short axis images (circumferential and short axis radial) showed good to excellent agreement between field strengths (ICC range 0.78–0.91). Similar results were observed with the second software package, though the differences in agreement between long and short axis derived measures were less pronounced. Conclusion Longitudinal strain and strain rate measures derived from CMR feature tracking have poor inter-field strength agreement between 1.5T and 3T. By contrast, agreement of circumferential and short axis radial strain and strain rate measurements at 1.5T and 3T is good. These results need to be considered when assessing strain at different field strengths. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): United Kingdom National Institute for Health Research