Abstract

This study inter-compares the spatiotemporal features of precipitation extremes at global and regional scales within six daily precipitation datasets, i.e., gauge-based (Global Precipitation Climatology Center dataset, GPCC), satellite-retrieval (Precipitation Estimation From Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Networks-Climate Data Record, PERSIANN-CDR), three reanalysis datasets (ERA-Interim, ERAI; the National Center for Atmospheric Research Reanalysis 2, NCEP2; and the WATCH-Forcing-Data-ERA-Interim, WFDEI), and products merged from the three type datasets (the Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation, MSWEP). All datasets reproduce similar spatial patterns of both annual and seasonal precipitation extremes over the period from 1979 to 2017. Compared to the reference dataset gauge-based GPCC, the reanalysis WFDEI outperforms among six products with spatial correlation coefficients of 0.89 and 0.80 for the annual extreme indices (i.e., annual total amount of 95th precipitation and maximum 1-day precipitation), respectively. The satellite-based product PERSIANN-CDR performs better than reanalyses and merged datasets in capturing the temporal variability of the intensity and amount of precipitation extremes with similar changing tendencies and magnitudes of about 45 mm day−1 and 230 mm at the global scale, respectively. The reanalyses and merged products underestimate the intensity of precipitation extremes. The selected six datasets behave differently in various regions. For the percentile-based frequency of precipitation extremes, NCEP2 performs well in regions of the Southeast Asian (SEA) and Amazon (AMZ), while WFDEI better matches GPCC over East North America (ENA) and North Australia (NAU) in both spatial patterns and temporal changes with correlation coefficients of 0.84 and 0.90, respectively. For the intensity features of annual precipitation extremes, NCEP2 performs better than other four datasets over regions of SEA, AMZ and West Africa (WAF). ERAI and WFDEI are consistent with GPCC in ENA and NAU with correlations coefficients of the intensity between ERAI (WFDEI) and GPCC are 0.82 (0.77) and 0.78 (0.64) for ENA and NAU, respectively. For the intensity of seasonal precipitation extremes, GPCC shows the highest estimates in regions of SEA, AMZ, ENA and WAF. ERAI and WFDEI perform better in reproducing the spatial patterns of seasonal precipitation extremes in all regions. NCEP2 (ERAI and WFDEI) show(s) consistent temporal variability of seasonal precipitation extremes with GPCC in regions of AMZ and WAF (ENA and NAU). Overall, there are large discrepancies in the absolute values of daily precipitation among datasets, and performances of non-gauged-based precipitation datasets in capturing the spatiotemporal variability of precipitation extremes are dependent on seasons, regions, and time periods.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.