Abstract

Abstract Lack (1967, 1968a) proposed that clutch size of waterfowl and other birds with self-feeding young was limited by females' ability to produce eggs. Lack supported this egg-production hypothesis by showing a strong inverse relationship between egg size and clutch size within and among species of waterfowl. A reanalysis using updated data and more appropriate statistics failed to confirm Lack's results. Grouping all the waterfowl produced a weak (r2 = 0.13 inverse relationship between relative egg size and relative clutch size. This relationship was due mainly to a handful of ducks that nest on oceanic islands. Analyses by tribes showed that relative egg size and relative clutch size were inversely related in only 2 of the 8 major tribes of waterfowl. Finally, intraspecific analyses failed to reveal a trade-off between egg size and clutch size in Blue-winged Teal (Anas discors) and Northern Shovelers (A. clypeata). Similar intraspecific analyses for 12 other waterfowl have failed to show the predicted inverse relationship between egg size and clutch size. These results suggest that the widely accepted egg-production hypothesis may be considerably overemphasized.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call