Abstract

Objective: This study aims to examine inter- and intra- reader variability in the ability to estimate hearing threshold through the interpretation of ABR waves of infants. The investigation is based on a large random sample of Australian audiologists.Study design: Sixty-one audiologists were presented with ABR tracings from 15 infants under 12 weeks old. In order to assess inter-rater variability, all cases were presented to all audiologists twice in the same session. Audiologists were asked to nominate a hearing threshold for each of the cases, based purely on their visual judgment of waveforms, and were also asked to answer a brief questionnaire about their experience in ABR testing.Results: Audiologists showed high levels of consistency in reading ABR results. The average inter-reader agreement score was 0.873 and the average intra-reader agreement score was 0.879. Our data show that audiologists’ years of experience in ABR testing significantly correlated with their intra-reader agreement scores (p= 0.004).Conclusion: Audiologists showed a good level of inter- and intra-reader-agreement in ABR interpretation. Years of experience in ABR testing were the main factor that contributed to audiologists’ high intra-rater agreement. Therefore, experience in ABR testing is essential in enhancing the outcome of ABR testing and lowering potential misdiagnosis rates.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call