Abstract
Protein efficiency ratio (PER), relative PER (RPER), net protein ratio (NPR), relative NPR (RNPR), and nitrogen utilization (NU) methods were investigated in an interlaboratory rat growth study. Six collaborating laboratories studied 7 protein sources (ANRC casein; minced beef; soya assay protein, SAP; pea flour; whole wheat flour, WW; rapeseed protein concentrate, RPC; and egg white solids, EW), and their 10 supplementary or complementary mixtures (casein + Met, SAP + Met, pea flour + Met, WW + Lys, WW + casein, WW + beef, WW + SAP, WW + pea flour, WW + RPC, WW + EW). Test protein(s) were added at the 8% level (N X 6.25). Casein + Met was used as the reference protein. Interlaboratory variation (estimated as between-laboratories coefficients of variation) of PER (up to 17.2%) was greater than that of RPER (up to 14.9%), NU (up to 9.5%), NPR (up to 7.0%), and RNPR, which had the lowest variability (up to 4.7%). In most cases, intralaboratory variation (estimated as within-laboratories coefficients of variation) for all the methods was less than 5%.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
