Abstract

ObjectivesTo systematically characterize intra‐limb patterns of skeletal plasticity to loading among living women, in order to better understand regional complexity in structural adaptation within the lower limb and more accurately infer behavior in the past.Materials and methodsWe used peripheral quantitative computed tomography imaging of the femur, tibia, first and second metatarsals to quantify bone morphology among female controls and athletes representative of either terrestrial or marine mobility, grouped by loading category (odd‐impact, repetitive low‐impact, and high‐magnitude). Parameters included midshaft bone density, areas, rigidity, and shape, epiphyseal bone densities and areas. We assessed between‐group differences and the influence of training history on significant variation among the loading groups.ResultsTerrestrial mobility strategies were best distinguished by significant midshaft periosteal hypertrophy across the lower limb/foot relative to controls, and by particularly high midshaft femoral and tibial cortical bone areas relative to rowers. Enhanced midshaft bone area was typically paired with decreased bone density among athlete groups. Sport‐specific variation in training duration/timing was significantly correlated with multiple midshaft parameters.DiscussionResults demonstrate characteristic patterns of intra‐limb adaptation to terrestrial and marine mobility strategies among active women relative to controls, and highlight components of these patterns that may be shaped in part by differences in loading duration/timing. Additionally, our findings support constraints on skeletal variation in the distal tibia and foot relative to more proximal locations about the knee among living women. For example, metatarsal variation was constrained, but where present reflected sport‐specific variation in force distribution in the foot.

Highlights

  • Biomechanical analyses in bioarchaeology and paleoanthropology frequently seek to infer human behavior in the past from between-group differences in limb bone cross-sectional geometric (CSG) properties, reflecting both diaphyseal areas and the radial distribution of bone (Macintosh, Davies, Pinhasi, & Stock, 2015; Macintosh, Pinhasi, & Stock, 2014a; Macintosh, Pinhasi, & Stock, 2014b; Ruff et al, 2015)

  • Sports were selected for inclusion in the study that reflected both intensive terrestrial and marine mobility strategies, subdivided into loading categories defined by Nikander et al (2006), Nikander et al (2010), and Nikander, Sievänen, Heinonen, and Kannus (2005)

  • The athlete drives off of this footplate with powerful muscular contractions of the lower limbs, producing high muscle magnitudes and muscle joint contact forces acting on the foot, ankle, and knee (Hase et al, 2002), but no vertical ground reaction forces or ground impacts are experienced by the lower limbs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biomechanical analyses in bioarchaeology and paleoanthropology frequently seek to infer human behavior in the past from between-group differences in limb bone cross-sectional geometric (CSG) properties, reflecting both diaphyseal areas and the radial distribution of bone (Macintosh, Davies, Pinhasi, & Stock, 2015; Macintosh, Pinhasi, & Stock, 2014a; Macintosh, Pinhasi, & Stock, 2014b; Ruff et al, 2015). Evidence of variation in many CSG properties, such as second moments of area or polar second moments of area, among living humans relative to sport-specific loading regimes is limited (Nadell & Shaw, 2016; Shaw & Stock, 2009a; Shaw & Stock, 2009b), among women (though see Macintosh, Pinhasi, & Stock, 2017; Niinimäki et al, 2017). Patterns of bone mass distribution and structural variation throughout the lower limb and foot of living humans with known loading regimes remains uncharacterized, especially among women

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.