Intensive Supportive Care Alone Does Not Impact Survival in a Lethal Non-Human Primate Model of Ebola Virus Disease

Abstract

Introduction: There are currently no licensed treatments for Ebola Virus Disease, making supportive care the only viable option. While there is anecdotal evidence that this is effective, the paucity of experimental data to demonstrate the role of supportive care in EVD has limited its use. We hypothesized that supportive care would enhance survival in a non-human primate (NHP) model of EVD. Methods: Three NHPs were infected with Ebola virus strain Makona and provided continuous bedside supportive care, including ventilatory support, fluid resuscitation, vasoactive medications, blood transfusion and hydrocortisone as needed to treat cardiovascular compromise. Findings: All three NHPs developed EVD and demonstrated a very similar clinical course and ultimately reached a terminal endpoint at an average time of 160 ± 8·7 hours post infection, which is similar to caged animals (144-192 hours). Fluid administration may have temporarily blunted a rise in lactate but the effect was short lived. Vasoactive medications, blood transfusion and hydrocortisone did not appear to have an impact. Interpretation: Supportive care did not impact survival length in a high stringency NHP EVD disease model. Our findings help support the need for the development and use of specific anti-Ebola therapies. Funding Statement: Funding was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Government of Canada. Declaration of Interests: None of the authors had a conflict of interest with regard to this study. Ethics Approval Statement: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional Animal Care Committee, in accordance with Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) guidelines.