Abstract
Biodenitrification using solid carbon sources is a cost-effective way for nitrate removal. In the study, wheat straw, cotton, poly(butylene succinate), and newspaper was chosen as the carbon source to compare the denitrification efficiency and bacterial communities in constructed wetlands. Parameters including COD, NO3−-N, NO2−-N and total nitrogen (TN) were analyzed. Results indicated that newspaper provided significantly higher NO3−-N and TN removal efficiency than the other three solid carbon sources in low-temperature condition. Moreover, both newspaper and wheat straw allowed high NO3−-N and TN removal efficiency in high-temperature condition. According to pyrosequencing analysis, denitrifying bacteria Dechloromonas and Thauera were the predominant genus in the anaerobic zone of CO- (3.92 and 2.35%, respectively), WS- (1.97 and 1.02%, respectively) and NP-CWs (1.71 and 1.31%, respectively). Genus of Levilinea was enriched in NP- (1.02%) and WS-CWs (0.91%). Furthermore, genus Paludibacter (2.69%) and Saccharofermentans (3.14%) showed high relative abundance in WS-CWs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
