Abstract

IntroductionIn a preceding trial comparing two different titration schemes, insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) showed good efficacy for achieving HbA1c <7% when administered twice daily (BID) in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, poor glycemic control persisted in a minority of patients. The current exploratory trial investigated the efficacy and safety of intensifying IDegAsp BID treatment in these patients by either adding a once-daily (OD) bolus injection of insulin aspart (IAsp) or by switching to a basal–bolus regimen of insulin degludec (IDeg) plus IAsp taken three times a day (TID).MethodA 26-week, randomized, open-label, phase 3b, treat-to-target trial in which 40 patients with T2D who had not reached target HbA1c ≤7.0% following previous 26-week treatment intensification with IDegAsp BID ±3 oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) were randomized (1:1) to receive IDegAsp BID + IAsp OD (n = 20) or IDeg OD + IAsp TID (n = 20).ResultsMean baseline HbA1c was 7.9% in the IDegAsp BID + IAsp OD group and 7.7% in the IDeg OD + IAsp TID group. After 26 weeks, the estimated mean change in HbA1c from baseline was 0.05% points in the IDegAsp BID + IAsp OD group and −0.49% points for IDeg OD + IAsp TID: estimated treatment difference (ETD) [95% confidence interval] 0.54% [0.09; 0.99], p = 0.021. Few achieved HbA1c <7% in IDegAsp BID + IAsp OD (four patients) and IDeg OD + IAsp TID groups (five patients). Fasting plasma glucose, hypoglycemia, and adverse events were similar between groups.ConclusionWhen used as intensification regimens in patients who failed to achieve target HbA1c during 26-week IDegAsp BID treatment, HbA1c improvements were numerically greater with IDeg OD + IAsp TID compared with IDegAsp BID + IAsp OD. No new safety issues were identified. However, the small, selective sample means clinical generalizations should be made with caution.FundingNovo Nordisk.Clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT01814137.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-016-0213-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • In a preceding trial comparing two different titration schemes, insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) showed good efficacy for achieving HbA1c \7% when administered twice daily (BID) in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D)

  • When used as intensification regimens in patients who failed to achieve target HbA1c during 26-week IDegAsp BID treatment, HbA1c improvements were numerically greater with IDeg OD ? insulin aspart (IAsp) times a day (TID) compared with IDegAsp BID ? IAsp OD

  • There was a gender imbalance between the two treatment arms, with more male patients being randomly assigned in the IDegAsp BID ? IAsp OD arm vs. the IDeg OD ? IAsp TID arm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In a preceding trial comparing two different titration schemes, insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) showed good efficacy for achieving HbA1c \7% when administered twice daily (BID) in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D). IDeg forms soluble multi-hexamers at the injection site and is slowly absorbed, while IAsp hexamers dissociate upon injection into rapidly absorbed monomers. This results in a novel pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile compared with premix insulins, characterized by the distinct basal to prandial effect observed with IDegAsp [2], with a stable basal insulin coverage over a 24-h period due to the IDeg component, and without the need for resuspension. A combined analysis of these two trials reports that estimated rate ratios of overall confirmed, nocturnal confirmed, and severe hypoglycemic events with IDegAsp BID compared with BIAsp 30 were 0.69 [95% CI 0.55; 0.87], 0.38 [95% CI 0.25; 0.58], and 0.16 [95% CI 0.04; 0.59], respectively [6]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call