Intelligibility of bone-conducted speech at different locations compared to air-conducted speech

Abstract

Bone-conduction transducers offer a unique advantage for radio communication systems, allowing sound transmission while the ear canals remain open for access to environmental sounds, or plugged for blocking of environmental sounds. This study compared the intelligibility of noise-degraded speech presented through bone-conduction hearing administered at different locations, and through air-conduction. Speech intelligibility was assessed using the Diagnostic Rhyme Test. Speech intelligibility was reduced for all of the bone-conduction hearing locations, relative to air-conduction hearing. There were also differences in performance for the various bone conduction locations. These results suggest that given noise-degraded speech, the performance decrement from using bone conduction will have to be weighed against the benefits of being able to dynamically block the ear canal, or leave it open, as situations require. Further, the choice of bone conduction transducer location would need to weigh possible performance differences against the various practical advantages of each location.