Abstract
In a relatively short period of time, many liberal democracies made considerable efforts to balance effective (secret) intelligence activities with democratic values and scrutiny demands. In 1975, William Sullivan, former head of the FBI’s Domestic Intelligence Division, stated before the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (1976), the ‘Church Committee’, which investigated misconduct by the US Intelligence Community:During the ten years that I was on the US Intelligence Board . . . never once did I hear anybody, including myself, raise the question: ‘Is this course of action which we have agreed upon lawful, is it legal, is it ethical or moral?’ We never gave any thought to this line of reasoning, because we were just naturally pragmatists. The one thing we were concerned about was this: will this course of action work, will it get us what we want, will we reach the objective that we desire to reach?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.