Abstract
The fight against modern forms of crime such as organized crime, terrorism and other very serious crimes caused not only modification of procedural principles and procedural rules, but also the necessity of re-examination of evidence in terms of introducing new evidence in criminal proceedings. Given that the prevention, detection and proving in cases of mentioned offenses represent the systemic issue and that the efficiency is caused by cohesion of preventive and repressive mechanisms in each strategy of preventing and combating serious crimes, the more often raised question, aroused from the practice, is the issue of the use of information gathered by the police or security services as evidence in criminal proceedings. In addition, there is the issue of use of illegal evidence, the ways in which these evidence are defined in some jurisdictions and which are the legal consequences of their use in judicial decision, whether it is based only on them, or on some other evidence beside them. The author addresses the issues of necessity and justification for use of information of security services as evidence in criminal proceedings, their definition and difference with respect to data, experiences and practices in other countries and of course their use as evidence in criminal proceedings of Serbia. Also, the paper addresses the Criminal Intelligence Analytics, exchange of information between the competent authorities at national and international level.
Highlights
Detection and proving in cases of mentioned offenses represent the systemic issue and that the efficiency is caused by cohesion of preventive and repressive mechanisms in each strategy of preventing and combating serious crimes, the more often raised question, aroused from the practice, is the issue of the use of information gathered by the police or security services as evidence in criminal proceedings
There is the issue of use of illegal evidence, the ways in which these evidence are defined in some jurisdictions and which are the legal consequences of their use in judicial decision, whether it is based only on them, or on some other evidence beside them
У сваком случају, борба против тероризма не може да послужи као аргумент да се наруши право на правично суђење, владавина права и основни принципи кривичног правосуђа
Summary
Уколико је кривично законодавство постало основни инструмент заштите друштва од тешких облика криминалитета, онда је претварање информација у доказе оно што је примарно и чега сви они који се баве прикупљањем података морају бити свесни и то у најранијој фази поступања. У борби против савремених облика криминалитета акценат треба ставити на повезивање сазнања, простор процедура ради размене информација, односно сазнања на начин који би био од заједничке користи. Прикупљени подаци се анализирају са намером да се на основу њих створи нови употребљив производ (корисна информација) који је у највећем броју случајева резултат рада служби државне и јавне безбедности, јер се ради о систематском прикупљању података и различитих изво––––––––––. Сами подаци који се прикупљају нису косрисни у изворном облику, већ морају бити потврђени из више извора и обрађени аналитички, а да би се добила корисна информација. Ово може бити остварено само у окружењу које подржава полицијски рад вођен аналитичким информацијама, односно који аналитичку информацију сматра предусловом ефикасног оперативног полицијског рада
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
