Abstract
The present study aims to highlight the most important axes of discussion and intellectual debate generated by the Corona virus at the end of the year 2019, in the intellectual and political arena in the world between thinkers and intellectuals, remotely from political argumentation between China and the United States regarding the responsibility of each side for the spread of the virus on the one hand, and irrespective of their differing ideological orientations on the other hand, as manifested and exemplified in the arguments of: Carolin Emcke, the Moroccan poet Muhammad Bnais, the two French philosophers Michel Onfray, Edgar Morin, and the American intellectual Naom Chomsky, and others. The study reached two conclusions: First: As a consequence of the feeling of "collective danger" which assaulted the world and humanity, there arose an orientation among intellectuals and thinkers advocating a return to "common roots" which unify humanity, and which impel it to solidarity to confront the overarching common challenges besetting the world and the universe. Second: There is almost total unanimity among the intellectuals and thinkers that notwithstanding the fact that globalization constitutes a "cornerstone" in the progress of humanity and its movement towards the future, it nevertheless represents a "wild capitalism" which rendered the Corona pandemic for the thinkers and intellectuals a "historic opportunity" to restore importance to the individual and humanity in "building the future
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.