Abstract
This article considers the formation and implementation of a policy in relation to intellectual property in the activities of a higher education institution. Nowadays the creation, protection and commercialization of intellectual property objects are especially relevant for universities. The comprehensive solution of such issues stipulates the need for the development, adoption and implementation of university policies in relation to intellectual property objects as local regulatory acts. This study aims at analyzing intellectual property management policies in higher education institutions. The authors of the article have highlighted the key aspects of an intellectual property object as an object of management. To prove the relationship between intellectual property law and regulation that allows a university to own and freely dispose of its intangible assets, the article dwells on the best practices of European and US universities in terms of issuing local legal acts. The authors have concluded that it is inexpedient to copy the US university policy in Russia due to different approaches to intellectual property. They have developed the concept of strategic management of intellectual property based on the national legislation on the protection and disposal of intellectual property and local regulations of higher education institutions.
Highlights
Typical features of economic growth are the intellectualization of the main factors of production and innovative development (Abdulkadyrov et al, 2021; Glinkina et al, 2020)
This study aims at analyzing intellectual property management policies in higher education institutions
International experience testifies that the innovative development management of any organization should act adequately or proactively, responding to the possible changes associated with the emergence of innovative technologies and new types of services offered by the market
Summary
Typical features of economic growth are the intellectualization of the main factors of production and innovative development (Abdulkadyrov et al, 2021; Glinkina et al, 2020). International experience testifies that the innovative development management of any organization should act adequately or proactively, responding to the possible changes associated with the emergence of innovative technologies and new types of services offered by the market. In this regard, the priority management system (as the most flexible) is a strategic management system. The priority management system (as the most flexible) is a strategic management system Such a management model will ensure the efficient use of the organization's intellectual capital, reduce the cost of producing goods and services, and create brand new products that are highly competitive in both national and foreign markets. The intensity of innovations and the efficiency of resources used for research and development largely depend on the legal protection of rights to intellectual deliverables (Zamiralova et al, 2020; Ermilov et al, 2020)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
