Abstract

Recent research has shown potential for psychedelic therapeutics as addiction treatments; however, some academic institutions, commercial entities and individuals are attempting to monopolize psychedelic compounds through exploiting the patent process. This Perspective article describes efforts that have been devised to mitigate exclusionary patent practices pertinent to psychedelic therapeutics for addiction. The non-profit Porta Sophia has identified 170 patent documents focused on treating addiction through psychedelics, and many of these patents could threaten to privatize public domain knowledge and severely limit or increase the cost of research if granted. Patent examiners who determine if a patent application should be granted must negate false claims to innovation. Yet, given the unique history of psychedelics, prior knowledge can be difficult to find. As a result, overreaching patents may be granted, causing dramatic shifts in access to addiction-focused psychedelic research, treatments, and funding. As the field of psychedelics approaches this critical inflection point of FDA decisions, it is imperative for all stakeholders - including university investigators, academic and commercial patent seekers, and policy makers - to utilize available tools for determining prior knowledge. Maintaining an informed awareness of legal patent eligibility and limitations is crucial for establishing an ethical patent landscape and ensuring subsequent access to these potential life-altering psychedelic therapeutics for addiction.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call