Integrity of personal radiation protective equipment (PRPE): a 3-year longitudinal follow-up study

Abstract

Abstract Background Personal radiation protective equipment (PRPE) such as lead aprons, vests, skirts and thyroid shields minimize radiation exposure of operators using ionizing radiation. However, PRPE might be prone to cracks and tears in the attenuating layer of the garments which results in inadequate radiation protection and increased operator dose. Currently, there are no uniform guidelines regarding regular inspection and/or rejection criteria of PRPE. Purpose This study aims to investigate the prevalence, qualification and quantification of PRPE integrity during a longitudinal follow-up. Methods All PRPE of a large, general hospital was yearly evaluated in the period 2018–2020. The equipment was inspected on a tele-operated X-ray table and cracks and tears were qualified and quantified using an X-ray opaque ruler. Rejection criteria of Lambert & McKeon were applied to accept or reject further use of the PRPE. In brief, all pieces, except for thyroid shields, with a total defect area larger than 670mm2 are rejected. For tears, specifically at the position of the gonads, an extra rejection criterion of 15mm2 is defined. For thyroid shields, the rejection criterion is set to 11mm2. Results In the 3-year follow-up period, a total of 915 PRPE were evaluated. 43.3% of PRPE showed tears and 29.3% needed to be rejected based on the Lambert & McKeon criteria. More specifically, in 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively, 17.4%, 16.9% and 21.2% were rejected. In the attached figure, typical examples of visualized defects are represented. The median tear area (interquartile range) was 12 (30) mm2. Remarkably, of 195 newly registered PRPE, 8.7% showed tears in the first year of use of which 88.2% needed to be rejected. In the latter case, the median tear area (interquartile range) was 40 (50) mm2. Information regarding purchase date and size is missing in respectively 45.5% and 50.7% of the cases. Additionally, 13.7% lacked information regarding lead equivalency. Conclusion PRPE are prone to tears and cracks. Up to 40% of PRPE showed tears and cracks resulting in nearly 20% rejections. Newly purchased PRPE are not guaranteed to remain free of cracks and tears in the first year of use. These results urge the importance for regular X-ray based integrity analysis of PRPE. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.