Abstract

Aside from the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) information, root-mean-square (RMS) maps are also provided as the standard deviations of the corresponding TEC errors in global ionospheric maps (GIMs). As the RMS maps are commonly used as the accuracy indicator of GIMs to optimize the stochastic model of precise point positioning algorithms, it is of crucial importance to investigate the reliability of RMS maps involved in GIMs of different Ionospheric Associated Analysis Centers (IAACs) of the International GNSS Service (IGS), i.e., the integrity of GIMs. We indirectly analyzed the reliability of RMS maps by comparing the actual error of the differential STEC (dSTEC) with the RMS of the dSTEC derived from the RMS maps. With this method, the integrity of seven rapid IGS GIMs (UQRG, CORG, JPRG, WHRG, EHRG, EMRG, and IGRG) and six final GIMs (UPCG, CODG, JPLG, WHUG, ESAG and IGSG) was examined under the maximum and minimum solar activity conditions as well as the geomagnetic storm period. The results reveal that the reliability of the RMS maps is significantly different for the GIMs from different IAACs. Among these GIMs, the values in the RMS maps of UQRG are large, which can be used as ionospheric protection level, while the RMS values in EHRG and ESAG are significantly lower than the realistic RMS. The rapid and final GIMs from CODE, JPL and WHU provide quite reasonable RMS maps. The bounding performance of RMS maps can be influenced by the location of the stations, while the influence of solar activity and the geomagnetic storm is not obvious.

Highlights

  • The ionospheric delay is one of the crucial error sources in global navigation satellite system (GNSS)-based precise positioning techniques, such as precise point positioning (PPP)

  • We define this percentage as the RMS bounding percentage (RMSBP) and refer to the percentages corresponding to 1RMS, 2RMS and 3RMS as 1RMSBP, 2RMSBP and 3RMSBP, respectively, for the sake of simplicity, which are shown in the Ionospheric Model Integrity Diagram (IMID)

  • global ionospheric maps (GIMs) products are frequently employed to mitigate the ionospheric delay or for pseudo-observations to constrain the ionospheric parameters in precise positioning techniques, such as PPP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ionospheric delay is one of the crucial error sources in global navigation satellite system (GNSS)-based precise positioning techniques, such as precise point positioning (PPP). For singlefrequency PPP, a priori ionospheric information has either been used to correct the ionospheric delay or as pseudoobservations to constrain the ionospheric parameters in PPP models (Shi et al 2012). In these cases, the accuracy information of the corresponding ionospheric models is of crucial importance to set the optimal weighting strategy and to avoid anomalies in positioning errors, which is helpful to reduce the convergence time and to enhance the positioning accuracy of PPP (Li et al 2020a). As of early 2020, there are seven IAACs that provide GIM products using different techniques

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call