Abstract
Abstract The present work reported tests of a new solvent 30 wt% MEA-Methanol compared to aqueous 30 wt% MEA solvent in a pilot-plant test bed, which comprises the complete absorption/desorption. The two solvents were studied in the same way in the test bed and detailed results were reported for both solvents. The measurements were carried out at a constant CO2 removal rate of 90% by an adjustment of the regeneration energy in the desorber for systematically varied L/G ratios, flue gas flow rate and absorber height. Results from these studies indicated that MEA-Methanol solvent had a faster CO2 absorption rate and a lower regeneration energy consumption compared to aqueous MEA solvent. Regeneration heat duty (Qreg) of MEA-Methanol solvent at optimum operating conditions was obviously lower than that of aqueous MEA solvent (3.22 MJ/kg CO2 and 4.04 MJ/kg CO2, respectively), which showed that MEA-Methanol had a potential to replace aqueous MEA solvent in industrial CO2 pilot plant.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
