Abstract
AbstractThe seismic inversion method using the seismic onset times has shown great promise for integrating real- continuous seismic surveys for updating geologic models. However, due to the high cost of seismic surveys, such frequent seismic surveys are not commonly available. In this study, we focus on analyzing the impact of seismic survey frequency on the onset time approach, aiming to extend the advantages of onset time approach when infrequent seismic surveys are available.To analyze the impact of seismic survey frequency on the onset time approach, first, we conduct a sensitivity analysis based on the frequent seismic survey data (over 175 surveys) of steam injection in a heavy oil reservoir (Peace River Unit) in Canada. The calculated onset time maps based on seismic survey data sampled at various time intervals from the frequent data sets are compared to examine the need and effectiveness of interpolation between surveys. Additionally, we compare the onset time inversion with the traditional seismic amplitude inversion and quantitatively investigate the nonlinearity and robustness for these two inversion methods.The sensitivity analysis shows that using interpolation between seismic surveys to calculate the onset time an adequate onset time map can be extracted from the infrequent seismic surveys. This holds good as long as there are no changes in the underlying physical mechanisms during the interpolation period. A 2D waterflooding case demonstrates the necessity of interpolation for large time span between the seismic surveys and obtaining more accurate model update and efficient data misfit reduction during the inversion. The SPE Brugge benchmark case shows that the onset time inversion method obtains comparable permeability update as the traditional seismic amplitude inversion method while being much more efficient. This results from the significant data reduction achieved by integrating a single onset time map rather than multiple sets of amplitude maps. The onset time approach also achieves superior convergence performance resulting from its quasi-linear properties. It is found that the nonlinearity of the onset time method can be smaller than that of the amplitude inversion method by several orders of magnitude.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.