Abstract

BackgroundLeprosy was eliminated as a public health problem (<1 case per 10,000) in India by December 2005. With this target in sight the need for a separate vertical programme was diminished. The second phase of the National Leprosy Eradication Programme was therefore initiated: decentralisation of the vertical programme, integration of leprosy services into the primary health care (PHC) system and development of a surveillance system to monitor programme performance.Methodology/Principal FindingsTo study the process of integration a qualitative analysis of issues and perceptions of patients and providers, and a review of leprosy records and registers to evaluate programme performance was carried out in the state of Orissa, India. Program performance indicators such as a low mean defaulter rate of 3.83% and a low-misdiagnosis rate of 4.45% demonstrated no detrimental effect of integration on program success. PHC staff were generally found to be highly knowledgeable of diagnosis and management of leprosy cases due to frequent training and a support network of leprosy experts. However in urban hospitals district-level leprosy experts had assumed leprosy activities. The aim was to aid busy PHC staff but it also compromised their leprosy knowledge and management capacity. Inadequate monitoring of a policy of ‘new case validation,’ in which MDT was not initiated until primary diagnosis had been verified by a leprosy expert, may have led to approximately 26% of suspect cases awaiting confirmation of diagnosis 1–8 months after their initial PHC visit.Conclusions/SignificanceThis study highlights the need for effective monitoring and evaluation of the integration process. Inadequate monitoring could lead to a reduction in early diagnosis, a delay in initiation of MDT and an increase in disability rates. This in turn could reverse some of the programme's achievements. These findings may help Andhra Pradesh and other states in India to improve their integration process and may also have implications for other disease elimination programmes such as polio and guinea worm (dracunculiasis) as they move closer to their elimination goals.

Highlights

  • The National Leprosy Control Programme was launched inIndia in 1955, using surveys, education and dapsone monotherapy to detect and treat leprosy cases

  • We reviewed leprosy records and registers at each primary health care (PHC) clinic for the period 1st Dec 2004-1st Dec 2005, to evaluate programme performance

  • Almost all PHC staff expressed satisfaction with the quality and frequency of training provided during functional integration

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The National Leprosy Control Programme was launched inIndia in 1955, using surveys, education and dapsone monotherapy to detect and treat leprosy cases. Leprosy patients and rifampicin and dapsone for paucibacillary (PB) leprosy, replaced dapsone monotherapy and the first phase of this vertical programme focussed on detecting and treating all leprosy cases. This successfully reduced the national prevalence of Integration into Primary Health Care (PHC) in Orissa and Andhra Pradesh, India’’. Functional integration included training PHC staff to, diagnose and manage leprosy and its complications, maintain MDT stocks, record and report cases and carry out information, education and communication (IEC) activities. Leprosy was eliminated as a public health problem (,1 case per 10,000) in India by December 2005 With this target in sight the need for a separate vertical programme was diminished. Eradication Programme was initiated: decentralisation of the vertical programme, integration of leprosy services into the primary health care (PHC) system and development of a surveillance system to monitor programme performance

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call