Abstract
To investigate costs in working hours for initial integration of interictal EEG source localization (ESL) into clinical practice of a tertiary epilepsy center, and to examine concordance of results obtained with three different ESL pipelines. This prospective study covered the first year of using ESL in the Epilepsy-Center Berlin-Brandenburg. Patients aged ≥14 years with drug-resistant focal epilepsy referred for noninvasive presurgical evaluation were included. Interictal ESL was based on low-density EEG and individual head models. Source maxima were obtained from two freely available software packages and one commercial provider. One physician and computer scientist documented their working hours for setting up and processing ESL. Additionally, a survey was conducted among epilepsy centers in Germany to assess the current role of ESL in presurgical evaluation. Of 40 patients included, 22 (55%) had enough interictal spikes for ESL. The physician's working times decreased from median 4.7 hours [interquartile range 3.9-6.4] in the first third of cases to 2.0 hours [1.9-2.4] in the remaining two thirds; p<0.01. In addition, computer scientist and physician spent a total of 35.5 and 33.0 working hours on setting up the digital infrastructure, and on training and testing. Sublobar agreement between all three pipelines was 20%, mean measurement of agreement (kappa) 0.13. Finally, the survey revealed that 53% of epilepsy centers in Germany currently use ESL for presurgical evaluation. This study provides information regarding expected effort and costs for integration of ESL into an epilepsy surgery program. Low result agreement across different ESL pipelines calls for further standardization.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.