Abstract

Inclusion of dispersal data in models of species’ distributions in response to environmental change has been advocated for more than 15 years. We investigated whether there has been a shift in recent publications to include dispersal processes and how dispersal estimates explicitly change the conclusions of analyses. To address this question, we conducted a systemic review of the literature to assess what kinds of dispersal data and methods are being included in species distribution models across taxa. We collected metadata on 6,406 publications, 907 of which included dispersal data. The proportion of papers that included dispersal data in estimates of the species’ range increased from 8% to 20% from 1991 to 2017. Evaluation of a subsample of 200 papers showed no evidence for differences in taxa studied between dispersal and non-dispersal publications, with most studies focused on North America or Europe. Dispersal was incorporated at a higher frequency in studies from South America, Africa, and island systems. We found that forecasting models predicting range shifts with climate change rarely used dispersal data, but when they did, range shift projections were greatly affected. Our simulation models, in which a range of dispersal estimates were included, showed that projections were greatly influenced by dispersal distance assumptions. We summarize best practices for future research on distributions, including potential methodologies for dispersal integration and highlight the problems if dispersal is ignored.

Highlights

  • The use of species distribution models (SDMs) to estimate species’ ranges has been widely implemented by biogeographers (Phillips et al 2006, Phillips and Dudik 2008, Franklin 2013)

  • The majority of the studies ignored dispersal, we found that the inclusion of dispersal estimates has risen from 1991 to 2017

  • We focused on dispersal as it is the most common term used when discussing movement within species’ distribution models (Holloway and Miller 2017)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of species distribution models (SDMs) to estimate species’ ranges has been widely implemented by biogeographers (Phillips et al 2006, Phillips and Dudik 2008, Franklin 2013). We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine how biogeographers are including dispersal estimates in species distribution modeling and whether this inclusion substantially influences study outcomes.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.